Thursday, June 24, 2010

Climate Change Methane Ocean Carbon Dioxide East Coast Colder Winters Obama Media Attack Barton BP Apology

Tags: Climate Change Methane Ocean Carbon Dioxide East Coast Colder Winters Obama Media Attack Barton BP Apology

Leonard Pitts of the McClatchy's Miami Herald is quite good. I don't read the New York Times anymore and started reading the Wall Street Journal again, but never read its editorial page.

The slowdown in the job increase, especially those over 55 whom the corporations took advantage of the recession to get rid of higher income employees. Reagan subsidized corporations and Bush, Jr further increased tax breaks for corporations to send jobs overseas and also blatantly used patented automation technology from Japan in the 1980s without compensation to replace workers with no significant improvement in production costs, but a powerful threat to current workers to keep wages low.

The Republican Study Committee, which includes almost all Republicans, almost unanimously believe what Joe Barton below thinks and says. He apologized to BP for our government's attack on them, took it back, and then re-state his BP support yesterday.

The constant media attack on Obama has changed what Americans think of Obama and for the first time more disagree with him than agree with his policies. The New York Times read by the powerful elites gave permission for the corporate press/media to attack Obama in the same way they gave permission to attack the Catholic church.

The Climate models indicate that in the future the Eastern Coast will be much colder in the winter than in the past. For whatever reasons, methane is starting to be released from the ocean off the California coast. Normally, the ocean is cold enough to keep methane from because a gas but I saw several days ago the intense bubbling off the California coast on TV. Methane has about 20 times more warming effects than carbon dioxide!

We also may be close to limit is the ability of the ocean to absorb carbon dioxide because of increasing acidity, especially seen in coastal waters. The temperature on earth went up sharply about 12 centuries ago when there was a huge release of carbon dioxide from the oceans and stayed stable for ten thousand years.

Only when we discovered oil in the ground did the temperature start to increase and sharply in the 1990s and 2000s along with carbon dioxide. Bush/Cheney allowing coal companies to expand production with putting in the modern pollution protection devices increased both carbon dioxide and other toxic pollutants. The carbon dioxide increase per year in carbon dioxide from 1% increase per year in the atmosphere to 2% increase per year changed the ball game.

... To peruse the CRP website (www.crp.org) is to be forcefully reminded just how much sway business interests have over what are supposedly OUR elected officials.

From South Carolina Rep. James Clyburn, who's received $145,000 from the utilities industry since 2009 to South Dakota Sen. Tim Johnson, who's received $322,000 since 2005 from insurance companies, to Nevada Sen. John Ensign's $305,000 from casinos since 2005 to Florida Rep. Kendrick Meek's $779,000 from lawyers since 2009, there is no shortage of lawmakers who work hard for the corporate money. What is less certain is the number who work hard for the national good. ...

President Obama had secured from BP a $20 billion escrow fund to help those whose lives were upended by the spill. You'd think that was a good thing, but Barton told BP CEO Tony Hayward, "I apologize. I do not want to live in a country where anytime a citizen or a corporation does something that is legitimately wrong is subject to some sort of political pressure that ... amounts to a shakedown. So I apologize." ... Barton alone has accepted more than $100,000 in donations from that industry just since 2009. And according to the non-partisan Center for Responsive Politics, oil interests have given him more than $1.4 MILLION since 1990 — more than any other representative. ...

Jim Kawakami, June 24, 2010, http://jimboguy.blogspot.com

By Leonard Pitts Jr. | Miami Herald

OK, let's make sure we have this straight.

An oil rig operated by British Petroleum explodes in the Gulf of Mexico. Eleven people die. As much as 2.5 million gallons of BP oil gushes into the Gulf every day. Fragile eco-systems are wrecked, sea life is slimed, fishermen and boaters who make their living from the Gulf are facing ruin and BP, we discover, had no real plan for handling a catastrophe of this magnitude.

So we should apologize to BP?

That was the astonishing, incomprehensible and galling conclusion of Texas Rep. Joe Barton last week in a congressional hearing. He was reacting to news President Obama had secured from BP a $20 billion escrow fund to help those whose lives were upended by the spill. You'd think that was a good thing, but Barton told BP CEO Tony Hayward, "I apologize. I do not want to live in a country where anytime a citizen or a corporation does something that is legitimately wrong is subject to some sort of political pressure that ... amounts to a shakedown. So I apologize."

Hours later, under fire from Democrats and his fellow Republicans, Barton apologized for the apology and retracted it. But the damage was already done.

Indeed, the gaffe was a gift to Democrats, who wasted no time hammering the GOP with it. Why not? The apology plays right into the narrative of a GOP snugly in the pocket of Big Oil. Barton alone has accepted more than $100,000 in donations from that industry just since 2009. And according to the non-partisan Center for Responsive Politics, oil interests have given him more than $1.4 MILLION since 1990 — more than any other representative.

As we can plainly see, he works hard for the money.

Still, it seems short-sighted to frame this only in the context of one politician — or even one party — in thrall to a single industry. To peruse the CRP website (www.crp.org) is to be forcefully reminded just how much sway business interests have over what are supposedly OUR elected officials.

From South Carolina Rep. James Clyburn, who's received $145,000 from the utilities industry since 2009 to South Dakota Sen. Tim Johnson, who's received $322,000 since 2005 from insurance companies, to Nevada Sen. John Ensign's $305,000 from casinos since 2005 to Florida Rep. Kendrick Meek's $779,000 from lawyers since 2009, there is no shortage of lawmakers who work hard for the corporate money. What is less certain is the number who work hard for the national good.

America's democracy has become a pay to play system in which lack of money equals invisibility and muteness. The solution is obvious: public funding of all national political campaigns.

How else will these people know who they work for? And isn't that ultimately the crux of Joe Barton's confusion?

Every election cycle, the people and the politicians join in an act of willful self-deception, a ritualized charade in which everybody knows the truth, but nobody speaks it. Politicians flood the airwaves with commercials that show them walking and talking with the common folk who listen with rapt attention. The final shot frames the candidate with a flag in the background as he or she gazes soulfully into the middle distance and promises to work on our behalf, to always be on our side.

They pretend to mean it and we pretend to believe it.

But last week, Joe Barton didn't even care enough to pretend. Instead, he stood tall against the people and environment of the Gulf Coast, and WITH the industry that gave him $1.4 million.

There is a certain raw truth in that image that blasts all pretense away. As he genuflects before his corporate masters, Barton also reflects the ugly underside of American politics. And validates an ancient axiom that suddenly sounds like a warning:

You get what you pay for.

ABOUT THE WRITER

Leonard Pitts Jr., winner of the 2004 Pulitzer Prize for commentary, is a columnist for the Miami Herald, 1 Herald Plaza, Miami, Fla. 33132. Readers may write to him via e-mail at lpitts@miamiherald.com. Leonard Pitts chats with readers every Wednesday from 1 p.m. to 2 p.m. EDT on www.MiamiHerald.com.

Read more: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2010/06/24/96406/meet-joe-barton-r-big-oil.html#ixzz0rnRxMlOZ

Wednesday, June 23, 2010

McChrystal Rolling Stone Hastings Michael Runaway General

Tags: Biden is Right Withdraw Most Troops McChrystal Rolling Stone Hastings Runaway General Flaws Counterinsurgency Taliban Too Strong

Only Genghis Kahn was able to win in Afghanistan by unrestricted brutality and killings. Just like in America, the number one concern is food, home, and safety. There are no good options. I agree with Vice President Biden that we should only keep a nominal number of troops protecting Karzai and Kabul and use predator drones to attack their leaders which has been incredibly effective in Northwest Pakistan. None of the leaders there are good options. Give the South to the Taliban Pashtuns tribe and give much of the North to the Northern Alliance. Only attack their leaders if they leave their designated area of influence.

Let the mineral riches Capitalism undermine their penchant for war. Burn the poppy fields even though the people will get mad as we did the food crops in Vietnam to get peaceful Vietnamese out of the conflict areas. Get rid of their income source.

Rachel Maddow again explains the McChrystal problem more clearly than any other commentator on television. Her expertise is in foreign policy. Don’t miss Rachel’s analysis. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26315908/ns/msnbc_tv-rachel_maddow_show/

The Rolling Stone exclusive by on McChrystal’s team in Afghanistan stolen by Time magazine and Politico which put a PDF of the whole article on their website before Rolling Stone did! I excerpted some good stuff not covered by the corporate press/media. Remember the latter influences the way we think more by exclusion or emphasis or sensationalism than outright lies.


Diplomacy does not work in Afghanistan.


I was always against killer McChrystal in the same way I was against hiring Blackwater to protect diplomats. Hiring killers. Obama obviously did not look into the public background of McChrystal, the absolutely wrong person to choose to run a war.


Jim Kawakami, June 23, 2010, http://jimboguy.blogspot.com


Last Paragraphs in Article. … Whatever the nature of the new plan, the delay underscores the fundamental flaws of counterinsurgency. After nine years of war, the Taliban simply remains too strongly entrenched for the U.S. military to openly attack. The very people that COIN seeks to win over – the Afghan people – do not want us there. Our supposed ally, President Karzai, used his influence to delay the offensive, and the massive influx of aid championed by McChrystal is likely only to make things worse.


"Throwing money at the problem exacerbates the problem," says Andrew Wilder, an expert at Tufts University who has studied the effect of aid in southern Afghanistan. "A tsunami of cash fuels corruption, delegitimizes the government and creates an environment where we're picking winners and losers" – a process that fuels resentment and hostility among the civilian population.


So far, counterinsurgency has succeeded only in creating a never-ending demand for the primary product supplied by the military: perpetual war. There is a reason that President Obama studiously avoids using the word "victory" when he talks about Afghanistan. Winning, it would seem, is not really possible. Not even with Stanley McChrystal in charge.


The general's staff is a handpicked collection of killers, spies, geniuses, patriots, political operators and outright maniacs. There's a former head of British Special Forces, two Navy Seals, an Afghan Special Forces commando, a lawyer, two fighter pilots and at least two dozen combat veterans and counterinsurgency experts. ...

________________________

... Part of the problem is structural: The Defense Department budget exceeds $600 billion a year, while the State Department receives only $50 billion. But part of the problem is personal: In private, Team McChrystal likes to talk shit about many of Obama's top people on the diplomatic side. One aide calls Jim Jones, a retired four-star general and veteran of the Cold War, a "clown" who remains "stuck in 1985." Politicians like McCain and Kerry, says another aide, "turn up, have a meeting with Karzai, criticize him at the airport press conference, then get back for the Sunday talk shows. Frankly, it's not very helpful." Only Hillary Clinton receives good reviews from McChrystal's inner circle. "Hillary had Stan's back during the strategic review," says an adviser. "She said, 'If Stan wants it, give him what he needs.' " …

"Make sure you don't get any of that on your leg," an aide jokes, referring to the e-mail.

By far the most crucial – and strained – relationship is between McChrystal and Eikenberry, the U.S. ambassador. According to those close to the two men, Eikenberry – a retired three-star general who served in Afghanistan in 2002 and 2005 – can't stand that his former subordinate is now calling the shots. He's also furious that McChrystal, backed by NATO's allies, refused to put Eikenberry in the pivotal role of viceroy in Afghanistan, which would have made him the diplomatic equivalent of the general. The job instead went to British Ambassador Mark Sedwill – a move that effectively increased McChrystal's influence over diplomacy by shutting out a powerful rival. "In reality, that position needs to be filled by an American for it to have weight," says a U.S. official familiar with the negotiations.

The relationship was further strained in January, when a classified cable that Eikenberry wrote was leaked to The New York Times. The cable was as scathing as it was prescient. The ambassador offered a brutal critique of McChrystal's strategy, dismissed President Hamid Karzai as "not an adequate strategic partner," and cast doubt on whether the counterinsurgency plan would be "sufficient" to deal with Al Qaeda. "We will become more deeply engaged here with no way to extricate ourselves," Eikenberry warned, "short of allowing the country to descend again into lawlessness and chaos." …

This is one of the central flaws with McChrystal's counterinsurgency strategy: The need to build a credible government puts us at the mercy of whatever tin-pot leader we've backed – a danger that Eikenberry explicitly warned about in his cable. Even Team McChrystal privately acknowledges that Karzai is a less-than-ideal partner. "He's been locked up in his palace the past year," laments one of the general's top advisers. At times, Karzai himself has actively undermined McChrystal's desire to put him in charge. During a recent visit to Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Karzai met three U.S. soldiers who had been wounded in Uruzgan province. "General," he called out to McChrystal, "I didn't even know we were fighting in Uruzgan!"

Growing up as a military brat, McChrystal exhibited the mixture of brilliance and cockiness that would follow him throughout his career. His father fought in Korea and Vietnam, retiring as a two-star general, and his four brothers all joined the armed services. Moving around to different bases, McChrystal took solace in baseball, a sport in which he made no pretense of hiding his superiority: In Little League, he would call out strikes to the crowd before whipping a fastball down the middle.

McChrystal entered West Point in 1972, when the U.S. military was close to its all-time low in popularity. His class was the last to graduate before the academy started to admit women. The "Prison on the Hudson," as it was known then, was a potent mix of testosterone, hooliganism and reactionary patriotism. Cadets repeatedly trashed the mess hall in food fights, and birthdays were celebrated with a tradition called "rat fucking," which often left the birthday boy outside in the snow or mud, covered in shaving cream. "It was pretty out of control," says Lt. Gen. David Barno, a classmate who went on to serve as the top commander in Afghanistan from 2003 to 2005. The class, filled with what Barno calls "huge talent" and "wild-eyed teenagers with a strong sense of idealism," also produced Gen. Ray Odierno, the current commander of U.S. forces in Iraq. …

The son of a general, McChrystal was also a ringleader of the campus dissidents – a dual role that taught him how to thrive in a rigid, top-down environment while thumbing his nose at authority every chance he got. He accumulated more than 100 hours of demerits for drinking, partying and insubordination – a record that his classmates boasted made him a "century man." One classmate, who asked not to be named, recalls finding McChrystal passed out in the shower after downing a case of beer he had hidden under the sink. The troublemaking almost got him kicked out, and he spent hours subjected to forced marches in the Area, a paved courtyard where unruly cadets were disciplined. "I'd come visit, and I'd end up spending most of my time in the library, while Stan was in the Area," recalls Annie, who began dating McChrystal in 1973.

McChrystal wound up ranking 298 out of a class of 855, a serious underachievement for a man widely regarded as brilliant. His most compelling work was extracurricular: As managing editor of The Pointer, the West Point literary magazine, McChrystal wrote seven short stories that eerily foreshadow many of the issues he would confront in his career. In one tale, a fictional officer complains about the difficulty of training foreign troops to fight; in another, a 19-year-old soldier kills a boy he mistakes for a terrorist. In "Brinkman's Note," a piece of suspense fiction, the unnamed narrator appears to be trying to stop a plot to assassinate the president. It turns out, however, that the narrator himself is the assassin, and he's able to infiltrate the White House: "The President strode in smiling. From the right coat pocket of the raincoat I carried, I slowly drew forth my 32-caliber pistol. In Brinkman's failure, I had succeeded." …

After Cpl. Pat Tillman, the former-NFL-star-turned-Ranger, was accidentally killed by his own troops in Afghanistan in April 2004, McChrystal took an active role in creating the impression that Tillman had died at the hands of Taliban fighters. He signed off on a falsified recommendation for a Silver Star that suggested Tillman had been killed by enemy fire. (McChrystal would later claim he didn't read the recommendation closely enough – a strange excuse for a commander known for his laserlike attention to minute details.) A week later, McChrystal sent a memo up the chain of command, specifically warning that President Bush should avoid mentioning the cause of Tillman's death. "If the circumstances of Corporal Tillman's death become public," he wrote, it could cause "public embarrassment" for the president.

"The false narrative, which McChrystal clearly helped construct, diminished Pat's true actions," wrote Tillman's mother, Mary, in her book Boots on the Ground by Dusk. McChrystal got away with it, she added, because he was the "golden boy" of Rumsfeld and Bush, who loved his willingness to get things done, even if it included bending the rules or skipping the chain of command. Nine days after Tillman's death, McChrystal was promoted to major general. …

It doesn't hurt that McChrystal was also extremely successful as head of the Joint Special Operations Command, the elite forces that carry out the government's darkest ops. During the Iraq surge, his team killed and captured thousands of insurgents, including Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the leader of Al Qaeda in Iraq. "JSOC was a killing machine," says Maj. Gen. Mayville, his chief of operations. McChrystal was also open to new ways of killing. He systematically mapped out terrorist networks, targeting specific insurgents and hunting them down – often with the help of cyberfreaks traditionally shunned by the military. "The Boss would find the 24-year-old kid with a nose ring, with some fucking brilliant degree from MIT, sitting in the corner with 16 computer monitors humming," says a Special Forces commando who worked with McChrystal in Iraq and now serves on his staff in Kabul. "He'd say, 'Hey – you fucking muscleheads couldn't find lunch without help. You got to work together with these guys.' "

Even in his new role as America's leading evangelist for counterinsurgency, McChrystal retains the deep-seated instincts of a terrorist hunter. …

When it comes to Afghanistan, history is not on McChrystal's side. The only foreign invader to have any success here was Genghis Khan – and he wasn't hampered by things like human rights, economic development and press scrutiny. The COIN doctrine, bizarrely, draws inspiration from some of the biggest Western military embarrassments in recent memory: France's nasty war in Algeria (lost in 1962) and the American misadventure in Vietnam (lost in 1975). McChrystal, like other advocates of COIN, readily acknowledges that counterinsurgency campaigns are inherently messy, expensive and easy to lose. "Even Afghans are confused by Afghanistan," he says. But even if he somehow manages to succeed, after years of bloody fighting with Afghan kids who pose no threat to the U.S. homeland, the war will do little to shut down Al Qaeda, which has shifted its operations to Pakistan. Dispatching 150,000 troops to build new schools, roads, mosques and water-treatment facilities around Kandahar is like trying to stop the drug war in Mexico by occupying Arkansas and building Baptist churches in Little Rock. "It's all very cynical, politically," says Marc Sageman, a former CIA case officer who has extensive experience in the region. "Afghanistan is not in our vital interest – there's nothing for us there."

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/17390/119236?RS_show_page=1


Tuesday, June 22, 2010

Medicare Cuts Repubs Against Until Obama Became President. Why?

Tags: Medicare Cuts, Repubs Refuse to Prevent, Primary Care Doctors Opting Out, Will Lose 40% Income


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/07/15/bush-vetoes-bill-stopping_n_112881.html

Bush Vetoes Bill Stopping Doctor’s Medicare Cuts, Huffington Post, Kevin Freking, July 15, 2008

When Bush vetoed the bill stopping Medicare Cuts in 2008, a two-thirds vote was necessary to override the veto. The override vote in the House was a lopsided 383-41 and in the Senate, the override vote was 70-26.


Why are Senate Republicans now filibustering every consequential bill passed in the House, even with high House Republican support? To stop Obama and consequently endanger the lives of senior Americans. First only 2 percent of doctors are going into primary care and of the primary care doctors now available, and secondly 39% refuse to take Medicare patients. The number can go much higher. What happens when your doctor retires?


Jim Kawakami, June 22, 2010, http://jimboguy.blogspot.com


WASHINGTON — Congress on Tuesday rejected President Bush's veto of legislation protecting doctors from a 10.6 percent cut in their reimbursement rates when treating Medicare patients.

The override vote in the House was a lopsided 383-41, easily meeting the two-thirds threshold needed to nullify the president's veto. About an hour later, the Senate voted to override, 70-26.

Bush has vetoed bills nine times, and Congress has had the muscle to override him only on a water projects bill and twice on farm legislation.

Lawmakers were under pressure from doctors and the elderly patients they serve to void the rate cut, which kicked in on July 1. The cut is based on a formula that establishes lower reimbursement rates when Medicare spending levels exceed established targets. …

Primary Care Doctors Hurt Most from Medicare Cuts Mayo Clinic Refusing to Take Medicare Patients http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2010/03/primary-care-disproportionally-hurt-medicare-cuts.html Doctors don’t garner much sympathy when they rail against the perpetual threat of Medicare reimbursement cuts.

In a story from CNNMoney.com, a primary care physician provides some stark reality.

In an independent solo primary care practice, employing an office staff and two nurse practitioners for instance, fixed costs add up to $60,000 per month. A 21% cut in Medicare reimbursement, assuming an average sized Medicare panel, can take away $3 out of every $5 a physician earns.

Compound that with the pressure for doctors to adopt expensive electronic medical records, along with rising malpractice insurance rates, and it’s easy to see why generalist doctors get disproportionally hurt by any decrease in Medicare payments.

Furthermore, private insurers often base their rate schedule on Medicare’s, so it’s likely their payments will correspondingly go down as well.

Two points become apparent from this situation. One, it’s another disincentive for any newly graduated doctor to pursue such a financially risky field like primary care; and, two, it’s apparent that the days of the solo practitioner are numbered.

Primary care practices will have to function as loss leaders, surviving only after by being bought by hospitals or larger physician organizations.

Similar Posts:

Saturday, June 19, 2010

News 6/19/10: CJR Accurate Polls? Recession: Fire Old People, States Broke?, WaPo Wall Street Criminals Ignore?

Tags: Polls Biased? Old People Fired States Bankrupt? Going After Criminals on Wall Street? CJR Wash Independent WSJ WaPo Time Mag

Wikipedia: The adjective nominal (ultimately from Latin nōmen, "name") generally relates to the concept of names, and often to the difference between what something is in name (ideally or theoretically) and what it is in reality. … http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nominal


I cancelled my New York Times subscription and am now getting the Wall Street Journal. So far Murdoch does not seem to be interfering with the Fire Wall between editorial comments and news reporting which the Times does not seem to understand. It is a pleasure to read news reports that does not try to obscure the truth as much as the Times by relegating the real important news towards the end of the long article which very few read.

The Wall Street Journal articles are much shorter and much better written. On occasion, I will try to bring news from CJR that is not emphasized by the Times.

Jim Kawakami, June 19, 2010, http://jimboguy.blogspot.com

News Analysis from Columbia Journalism Review

http://www.cjr.org/the_audit/audit_dc_notes_ouija_boards_ol.php

BIASED POLLS: A co-founder of the sports network ESPN and former play-by-play broadcaster, Rasmussen is an articulate and frequent guest on Fox News and other outlets, where his nominally nonpartisan data is often cited to support Republican talking points. …

GET RID OF OLD PEOPLE, COMPANY POLICY: The unemployment rate for over-55s is at the highest level since 1948. Since the recession started, both the number of older people seeking work and the rate of unemployment for over-55s have increased more sharply than for all other demographic groups. And older workers comprise a high share of the long-term unemployed. … —The tough, tough situation facing older unemployed workers gets much needed attention from The Washington Independent.

Time magazine goes big on “The Other Financial Crisis,” the one hitting the states. While the piece doesn’t break much new ground, it’s a compelling read that brings a lot of strands together.

WaPo States Such as Charlotte Going Bankrupt Almost no one — and no place — is exempt. Nearly everywhere, tax revenue plummeted as property values tanked, incomes dwindled and consumers stopped shopping. Falling prices for stocks and real estate have made mincemeat of often underfunded public pension plans. Unemployed workers have swelled the demand for welfare and Medicaid services. Governments that were frugal in the past are just squeaking by. Governments that were lavish in the good times, building their budgets on optimism and best-case scenarios, now risk being wrecked like a shantytown in an earthquake.

There are lots of nice details in here, too, like the 9-year-old in Charlotte, N.C., who found out that library branches might start closing and donated $595 in lemonade-stand earnings to help keep them open.

While the tale is sweet, the shock in Charlotte sure isn’t:

“People are asking, ‘We’re Charlotte, North Carolina. We’re big banks. How did we get like this?’ ” says county budget director Hyong Yi. The answer is rooted in that once booming economy. As Charlotte burgeoned, the county approved $1.5 billion in bonds to build a new courthouse and new schools, expand its jails, improve its parks and — irony alert — open state-of-the-art libraries. Then the recession hit. Local unemployment rose to 11.7% in January — twice what it was two years earlier. Homes and commercial real estate lost value, which dried up the county’s chief revenue source, property taxes. The result: a 5% reduction in the upcoming budget, $71 million in cuts on top of $76 million in cuts the year before. Losing nearly $150 million in two years — an eternity of lemonade stands won’t fill that hole.

Like unemployment, this is an important story, and one that demands creativity to tell it well. For clues, check out Stateline.org, a project of the Pew Center on the States, which has been doing a lot of good work on the beat.

Obama Ignoring Criminals on Wall Street? It doesn’t inspire confidence in the Washington Post that it fails to mention the blockbuster SEC fraud charges against Goldman Sachs in a story about how the Obama administration has failed to file criminal charges against Wall Street.

Nearly 1 1/2 years into Obama’s tenure, despite several cases against mortgage companies whose lending practices contributed to the crisis, the administration has not brought any charges against the big Wall Street banks that took those loans, converted them into toxic securities and pumped them into the world’s financial markets. And law enforcement sources say no such charges are imminent.

The Post is apparently talking about criminal charges, but it doesn’t make that explicit. Here’s the lede:

Since taking office at the height of the financial crisis, President Obama has promised to hold Wall Street accountable for the meltdown. Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. reinforced that message in November when he vowed to prosecute Wall Street executives and others responsible for the crisis…


His Justice Department took steps to fulfill that promise this week when it arrested the former chairman of one of the nation’s biggest mortgage firms — the largest crisis-related criminal case — and announced that 1,215 people have been charged with mortgage fraud since March 1. But that success masks the government’s difficulties in the highest-profile investigations: those of Wall Street banks.

Even if it had spelled it out, I don’t know how you write a whole story on this without touching the Goldman civil charges. While it doesn’t mention Fabrice Tourre, it does find a sentence to devote to which floor the FBI’s task force head works on at the Department of Justice (fourth if you’re somehow interested).

If the execution is a bit off, the premise of the piece is not: There’s been a whole lot of rhetoric from Obama and his officials and not much action. It’s good that the Post focuses attention on this. The press has a vital role in creating the climate for prosecutions. This kind of story isn’t quite like a Gretchen Morgenson/Jonathan Glater investigation that exposes specific fraud, but not much is. These this-isn’t-happening stories are useful in keeping officials’ feet to the fire. … http://www.cjr.org/the_audit/wapo_flags_obama_inaction_on_w.php


Thursday, June 17, 2010

Achievement Doubling Income of the Poor Has No Effect on Achievement

Tags: Achievement Epigenetic Success Factors Culture Affluence Education Schools

David Brooks writes for the elites of our country to convince them only their efforts alone was the major factor contributing to their success. OK, sometimes he does exaggerate, but generally he puts out convincing arguments for his very conservative agenda which he continued after leaving the Wall Street Journal.

Many more recent young Asians had well educated and formerly affluent parents so they did well because their genes were modified epigenetically to fit the culture they came from for survival reasons. We can see in South Boston, in Appalachia, and many parts of the South, the Scots-Irish mentality of aggressiveness, paranoia, religiousity, and preference to live only with people who share their views.

Their tribal behavior survival mode was cultivated through continuous Wars and deprivation while living in Southwest Scotland and Northern Ireland. There are large numbers in the USA because they started emigrating as early as the eighteenth century in large numbers due to forcible British transplant and did not practice contraception widely. They are essentially The Republican Party now in the South, midwest, and the mountain states with a good dose in California. The Mormons in Utah are Scots-Irish. Those in Appalachia have not changed much since the 1700s. They make up a large part of the Caucasian arm forces now.

Yes, it is futile to get votes from the radical Republicans so Obama should stop trying and use every possible parliamentary procedure to get the votes through. Just compromise with the moderate Republicans.

The mistake Brooks make is that assuming that opportunity and money does not help is based on a very short history of trying to change the attitude of people. In Mexico, they pay the mother money (not the father) to get children to attend school and it is working!

Another thing that does not work is putting the individual over the group in schools. Do what is necessary to get a stable school environment. It seems that whenever order is imposed by a principal, some parent sues and gets them fired. Without order and safety, all bets are off. We have already seen in Washington, DC where a massive layoff of ineffective Principals and teachers has improved achievement in math and reading on both students and teachers in a very short time. A group of seniors all got into college where essentially none made it their just a few years ago.

Yes, it does take more money, but teaching in poor areas is bad so paying teachers at least double the usual salary is worth a lot more to society than just this extra cost demerit.

Jim Kawakami, June 17, 2010, http://jimboguy.blogspot.com

Doubling Income of the Poor Has No Effect on Achievement

NY Times, May 3, 2010, David Brooks

Letter to Editor: Professor Jai Prakash Sharma, Jaipur, India, May 4th, 2010

Since public policy in a democratic system is expected to reflect broad social consensus on vital issues of governance and development; and several social-psychological inputs, involving ethno-cultural beliefs, collective group aspirations, economic betterment demands and personal-social security perceptions of people go into making such a policy, it would be wrong to assume that public policy and political actions have just marginal impact on people's lives or their aspirations.

Again, ethnicity, sect, class or some other social grouping could never be viewed as fixed or frozen identities, for not only do they constitute an interactive relationship with the broad social universe, but also exhibit strong change impulse while negotiating their way to modernity. Thus, asking for minimal policy intervention in public arena, and leaving different ethno-social groups intact with their cocooned social space would be a status-quoist view of social existence, going against the very notion of change, modernity and progress.

______________________________________


Achievement: Doubling Income of the Poor Has No Effect on Achievement : Life Outcome Historical Experiences, Cultural Attitudes, Child-Rearing Practices, Family Formation Patterns, Expectations About the Future, Work Ethics and Quality of Social Bonds When you try to account for life outcome differences this gigantic, you find yourself beyond narrow economic incentives and in the murky world of social capital. What matters are historical experiences, cultural attitudes, child-rearing practices, family formation patterns, expectations about the future, work ethics and the quality of social bonds.

Researchers have tried to disaggregate the influence of these soft factors and have found it nearly impossible. All we can say for sure is that different psychological, cultural and social factors combine in myriad ways to produce different viewpoints. As a result of these different viewpoints, the average behavior is different between different ethnic and geographic groups, leading to different life outcomes.

It is very hard for policy makers to use money to directly alter these viewpoints. In her book, “What Money Can’t Buy,” Susan E. Mayer of the University of Chicago calculated what would happen if you could double the income of the poorest Americans. The results would be disappointingly small. Doubling parental income would barely reduce dropout rates of the children. It would have a small effect on reducing teen pregnancy. It would barely improve child outcomes overall. … http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/04/opinion/04brooks.html?ref=davidbrooks


Wednesday, June 16, 2010

Obama: BP Agrees to $20 Billion Escrow Fund. Press and Media Oil Criticism of President Propaganda or News?

Tags: BP Obama $20 B Escrow Agreed, BP Cost Shortcuts Disaster, NYT Influence, Voters Decide,

The New York Times heavily influences what other press and media say about President Obama. To a critical reader, this can be observed in how the Times emphasizes news stories in its headlines and first half dozen paragraphs. Therefore it is not surprising that the media has taken this up with a bang including Keith Olbermann, MSNBC’s star commentator who is normally very logical and fair. How we think depends a lot on what we see, hear, and read.

American voters unlike French ones do not relish discussing politics with folks who have opposing views and sometimes different opinions on television from FOX (not so much), CNN, MSNBC to network news, and even PBS Jim Lehrer. Giving the appearance of being even handed lets opposing views talk without critical questions by the host. It takes more than the background most Americans have about what is happening in Washington.

So most voters as a very recent study showed, vote on how the candidate looks as a replacement for true knowledge about how the congressperson, senator, or President will vote and behave in office.

ScienceDaily (June 15, 2010) — http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/06/100615105330.htm Are voters truly sophisticated and rational decision makers? Apparently not. Their choices are heavily influenced by superficial, nonverbal cues, such as politicians' appearance, according to Christopher Olivola from University College London in the UK and Alexander Todorov from Princeton University in the US. According to their findings1, voters make judgments about politicians' competence based on their facial appearance and these appearance-based competence judgments reliably predict both voting decisions and election outcomes.

The research is published in the June 2010 issue of the Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, a Springer publication. …


Jim Kawakami, June 16, 2010, http://jimboguy.blogspot.com


BP Executives Agree today on $20 Billion Escrow Fund administered by Ken Feinberg who ran the compensation. http://c-span.org/Watch/Media/2010/06/16/HP/R/34267/BP+execs+agree+to+Oil+Spill+Fund.aspx

Wikipedia: Kenneth Feinberg (born October 23, 1945, Brockton, Massachusetts)[1] is an American attorney, specializing in mediation and alternative dispute resolution. Feinberg was appointed Special Master of the U.S. Government's September 11th Victim Compensation Fund and currently serves as the Special Master for TARP Executive Compensation, popularly called the "pay czar." He is currently under consideration as the person to oversee the proposed BP Deepwater Horizon Disaster Victim Compensation Fund. He is also an adjunct professor at the Georgetown University Law Center and at the Columbia University School of Law. … http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenneth_Feinberg

http://c-span.org/Watch/Media/2010/06/16/HP/R/34267/BP+execs+agree+to+Oil+Spill+Fund.aspx

As usual Maureen Dowd unjustly trashes Obama by attacking his personality and not what he can do and what he has done which reminds me how she attacked Gore’s brown suits in the 2,000 election which led to the current debacle of no regulations period. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/16/opinion/16dowd.html

BP Repeatedly Ignored Safety Procedures in Drilling Operations Columbia Journalism Review, Ryan Chittum, June 15, 2010 The evidence keeps stacking up that BP cut all kinds of corners to save time and money at the expense of safety while drilling the Deepwater Horizon well. The Wall Street Journal goes A1 with congressional confirmation of its excellent BP story from three weeks ago.

In one case, BP engineers decided on April 16 to use just six so-called “centralizers” to stabilize the well before cementing it, instead of 21 as recommended by contractor Halliburton Corp. according to BP internal emails made public by the panel.


In their letter, the lawmakers say that BP’s well team leader, John Guide, “raised objections to the use of the additional centralizers” in an April 16 email released by the panel. “It will take 10 hrs to install them…I do not like this,” Mr. Guide wrote.

The lawmakers cited another BP email as an indication that “Mr. Guide’s perspective prevailed.” A BP official wrote in an April 16 email: “Who cares, it’s done, end of story, will probably be fine.” … Somebody up the chain was putting pressure on these guys to get the well drilled. How far up the chain? How much pressure? We’re still waiting for those stories.

There’s also this, which the Journal reported last month: Mr. Waxman also highlighted BP’s decision not to take 12 hours to completely circulate the heavy drilling fluid in the well, a step that would have allowed them to check if gas was leaking into the well and clean it out.

BP also skipped a test to determine if the cement had properly bonded to the well and rock formations, according to documents from oilfield service firm Schlumberger Ltd., whose crew was sent back to shore hours before the explosion.

While the test would have allowed BP to check if the cement job was adequate and allowed for repairs, it would have taken nine to 12 hours just for the test.


A petroleum engineer advising the congressional committee called the decision not to run a cement bond test “horribly negligent.”

I don’t know how much of this stuff would have come out without the Journal’s earlier reporting, but you can bet it wouldn’t have come out this quickly. All the more reason to applaud the paper’s excellent work in the Gulf. … http://www.cjr.org/the_audit/congress_confirms_wsjs_story_o.php

Tuesday, June 15, 2010

Oil: BP Cheap Parts Shortcuts Ignored Safety for Profits, Food & Corporations Rule the World

Tags: Oil: BP Cheap Parts Shortcuts Ignored Safety for Profits, Food & Corporations Rule the World

Oil: BP Cheap Parts Shortcuts Ignored Safety in Favor of Increased Profits McClatchy Newspapers Erika Bolstad Monday June 14, 2010 http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2010/06/14/95836/congress-bp-made-risky-decisions.html

Most of you who paid close attention already know that BP has always overwhelmingly chosen profits over safety in Alaska pipelines, in refinery explosions and fire, and in deep sea oil and gas drilling rigs. Today another fire was reported on the oil recovery ship, which BP attributed to a lightning strike. They probably “forgot” to monitor natural gas leaks in their equipment.

Oil companies claim that drilling a relief pipe would be too expensive at $100 million dollars. This price can be compared to the billions of dollars of multi-years damaged done because of their negligence. We need to assume that mistakes would be made to cause these disasters so we must err on the side of safety and simplicity of operations.

Watching the testimony on C-SPAN by operators of the rig, I observed that these operations are very complex and if one person screws up, a disaster could occur. Oil companies need to simplify and increase the capability of individuals who run these rigs and a continuous safety check of operations needs to be done with regulations.

When Corporations Rule the World

Back in 1995, I picked up a bargain book for $2 by Korten called When Corporations Rule the World written by a former Harvard business school professor who spent 30 years with the Ford Foundation trying to improve their economy. He concluded that the best thing we could do is to provide funding, but don’t allow them to become profit centers for international corporations.

Now just a handful of food corporations control what most of us eat and drink. Our obesity, diabetes 2, and general poor health epidemic resulted from corporations feeding us foods stripped of fiber, nutrients, and flavor, and enhancing flavor by adding large amounts of High Fructose Corn Syrup (HFCS) because it does not crystallize on storage and freezing as regular sugar does. Another Reagan (1984) contribution when he heavily subsidized corn (HFCS) where corporations can sell corn for nothing as they did in Mexico and still make a profit.

Our metabolic system cannot tolerate high amounts of fructose contained in both regular sugar and in HFCS. Fructose cannot be used directly by our cells as glucose, so Fructose is metabolized in our liver not only to produce glucose which becomes glycogen, a stored sugar, but it also produces 30% bad cholesterol, triglycerides, fatigue. All our cells increase their fructose enzymes to metabolize excess fructose, it uses up our energy ATP in our cells and the cell dies. The DNA and materials produce purines which are then converted to Uric Acid. Get your uric acid tested. It is a cheap test which old doctors thought important. Now it is not done.

The uric acid inflames our blood vessels and reduces its ability to expand resulting in high blood pressure. Inflamed blood vessels increase plaque formation to cause heart disease. Cancer spreads to inflamed organs too! Cytokines are produced around inflammations. That is why the C-Reactive Protein Test, usually ignored by physicians, should also be obtained at least once a year. It costs the same as cholesterol tests and is probably a better indicator of possible heart disease and cancer.

Although the research is not complete yet, mice studies at Princeton University showed that mice fed equal calories of cane sugar and HFCS ate different amounts of food and the one fed HFCS gained weight because it ate more mice chow. All the mice have the same DNA genes just like identical twins, something in the metabolism of fructose causes humans and mice to also eat more, a perfect sugar for Fast Food and other restaurants. A logical hypothesis is that Leptin, the appetite suppressor, does not leave the brain as easily to signal us to stop eating, possibly due to inflamed tighter pores in brain tissue.

When I stopped drinking high fructose orange and apple juice, I was able to control my systolic blood pressure (high number) and keep it low even though I increased the amount of salt I have daily and lost ten pounds off my belly. Belly fat is the stored fat that goes down first when we have an appropriate diet. It is more what we eat than how much. More natural fiber can only be easily in non-processed food. What it does is that as long as you drink enough water, the fiber greatly helps us from becoming constipated which increases our weight because more nutrients are taken in, the longer food sits in our intestines.

A fairly simple book to read that I recommend highly is The Sugar Fix: The High-Fuctose Fallout that is making You Fat and Sick, by Richard J. Johnson, MD with Timothy Gower who is a good writer. Dr. Johnson is a Kidney doctor and wanted to find out how to prevent diabetes 2, the leading cause of kidney failure. His research reported in the Journal of the American Medical Association and other peer reviewed journals shows clearly that we can believe what Dr Johnson tells us.

The corporations now control just about everything we do and it got a lot worse under CEOs Bush and Cheney. The damage they did to our country has been both obvious and not so obvious. Every week President Obama encounters another unexpected problem due to a change in both laws and regulations and installing incompetents in our government Civil Service system. They even fired federal top Republican prosecutors who did not break the laws to do what was politically expected in elections by fraudulently charging Democrats with a crime just before an election.

To show even more blatantly that this court is in the pockets of corporations came from this decision a few days ago. The Supreme Court action to allow corporations to spend any amount of money to influence elections and the recent unsigned edict by our Supreme Court to stop the public funding of elections in Arizona was so unreal that I had to check the news to see this really happened. Yes, it did!

Jim Kawakami, June 15, 2010, http://jimboguy.blogspot.com

Oil: BP Cheap Parts Shortcuts Ignored Safety in Favor of Increased Profits

WASHINGTON — BP knew its Macondo well was troublesome in the days leading up to a fatal April 20 blowout, congressional investigators found, but the company "appears to have made multiple decisions for economic reasons that increased the danger of a catastrophic well failure."

From the company's uncommon well design to its fatal decision not to circulate drilling mud, which could have cleared out pockets of gas, and the lack of critical testing, which could have pinpointed problems with its cementing, the company had many points at which it could have prevented an explosion, investigators with the House Energy and Commerce Committee have found.

Instead, the company violated industry guidelines and proceeded "despite warnings from BP's own personnel and its contractors," said the chairman of the committee, Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., and the chairman of the investigative subcommittee that handled the probe, Rep. Bart Stupak, D-Mich.

Those decisions led to 11 deaths and the worst oil spill in U.S. history and will continue to have an effect on the environment and the future of offshore drilling in the Gulf of Mexico, the two wrote in a letter to BP Chief Executive Officer Tony Hayward that was released Monday.

"Time after time, it appears that BP made decisions that increased the risk of a blowout to save the company time or expense," they wrote. "If this is what happened, BP's carelessness and complacency have inflicted a heavy toll on the Gulf, its inhabitants and the workers on the rig." Read more: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2010/06/14/95836/congress-bp-made-risky-decisions.html#ixzz0qwzqa8u0